5 Critical AI Governance Mistakes (and How to Truly Avoid Them)

Also available in:

Italiano

Why AI Governance Is a Business Priority (Not Just a Tech One)

Artificial intelligence offers competitive advantages, but poor governance can quickly turn it into a legal, operational, and reputational risk. According to McKinsey (2024), 45% of companies adopting AI face compliance issues within the first year.

Here are the five most frequent mistakes—and how to build a robust governance system inspired by the AI Act and NIST standards.

Mistake 1: Leaving Governance Solely to IT

Delegating AI governance exclusively to the IT department while ignoring legal, compliance, and ethical aspects creates organizational silos and increases exposure to systemic risks and undetected biases.

How to avoid it:

  • Establish a cross-functional committee including IT, Legal, Compliance, Risk, and Business stakeholders.
  • Schedule regular meetings to align internal policies with the AI Act (e.g., risk management under Art. 9).
  • Best practice: A retail leader reduced non-compliance risk by 30% by embedding compliance by design from the development phase.

Mistake 2: Ignoring Data Drift (and Model Degradation)

Many organizations underestimate the risk of model performance deterioration over time (model drift), leading to operational failures and potential compliance violations.

According to Gartner, by 2026, 75% of AI models will fail due to unmonitored drift.

How to avoid it:

  • Implement advanced monitoring systems (e.g., MLflow) to track real-time performance.
  • Schedule regular model retraining and quarterly dataset audits.
  • Set up automatic alerts for abnormal (>5%) variations in key metrics.

Mistake 3: Neglecting Documentation and Traceability

Lack of detailed logs and decision process traceability makes it impossible to prove compliance during audits. The AI Act (Annex IV) requires complete and auditable documentation for all high-risk systems.

How to avoid it:

  • Apply frameworks like ISO/IEC 42001 for document management.
  • Use structured templates that include training data, decision logs, and model versioning.
  • Tangible benefit: According to Deloitte, structured documentation cuts audit and inspection times by 40%.

Mistake 4: Underestimating Continuous Team Training

Insufficient training on AI ethics, bias, and regulatory requirements raises the risk of mistakes and sanctions. 62% of companies report critical training gaps (PwC, 2024).

How to avoid it:

  • Run workshops on bias detection, AI compliance, and AI Act requirements.
  • Use certified platforms (Coursera, Udemy, etc.) for ongoing training.
  • Monitor training effectiveness through KPIs and pre/post-training assessments.

Mistake 5: Failing to Scale Policies with Business Growth

Static or outdated policies fail to cover new use cases, markets, or technologies, exposing the business to penalties and operational issues. The AI Act requires ongoing review and dynamic adaptation.

How to avoid it:

  • Design modular policies with annual reviews.
  • Automate compliance checks with dedicated tools.
  • Real case: A fintech avoided fines in new markets by promptly adapting its AI governance policies.

Conclusions and Next Steps

Avoiding these mistakes means shifting from reactive governance to a proactive, scalable, and certifiable AI governance model.

Try our free assessment to evaluate your company’s AI maturity level and contact our experts for tailored consulting.